GAVIN.HARRIS ← Back to Track Record

Deal #1 · 1986

Two houses from one title: Chatham Ave

Development · Renovation · Cross-lease

My first deal, and it set the pattern for everything that followed: a site is rarely just one asset. It's whatever you can divide it into.

I bought a cross-lease property on Chatham Ave for $86,000 — one house, one title, on a section large enough to carry more. Rather than treat it as a single buy-and-sell, I split the project into two.

First, the existing house. I renovated it and sold it for $86,000 — recovering the full purchase price before anything else happened. That's the number most people would have stopped at.

Second, the section behind it, valued at $32,000 once separated out. I built a second house there for $75,000 and sold it for $105,000.

Two properties. Two sales. One purchase.

The numbers

Purchase (whole site)−$86,000
Sell renovated front house+$86,000
Build cost, rear house−$75,000
Sell rear house+$105,000
Net result+$30,000

The renovation is the part worth pausing on. Selling the front house for exactly what I paid for the whole property only works — and only makes sense — because the renovation lifted its value to cover the purchase price on its own. Without that uplift, the numbers don't clear and the section isn't really "free." The renovation is what turned the retained section into pure upside rather than a cost I was carrying.

What made it work Recognising the cross-lease title could support two independent outcomes, and doing the work — on the existing house, not just the new build — to make the maths stack up on both sides.
What I'd flag for anyone trying this today Cross-lease and subdivision requirements, consenting, and build costs have all moved on considerably since 1986. The mechanics look different now. The principle hasn't: renovate what's there to fund the deal, build what's possible to create the profit.